How Much Does an MVP Cost in 2026?

The honest answer: an MVP in 2026 costs between $5,000 and $150,000+. That range is huge because "MVP" means different things to different people — and because AI tools have fundamentally changed the bottom of the market.

This guide breaks down real costs based on what you're actually building, who's building it, and what tradeoffs you're making at each price point.

What Counts as an MVP?

An MVP (Minimum Viable Product) is the smallest version of your product that real users can use to validate your core idea. It's not a prototype. It's not a mockup. It's a working product that delivers real value — just with fewer features than the full vision.

The key word is "viable." If your users can't actually use it to accomplish the core task, it's not an MVP. If it crashes, loses data, or has security holes, it's not viable.

MVP Cost by Approach

Let's break each one down.

$0-$5K: AI-Generated Prototypes

Tools like Cursor, Bolt, Lovable, and Replit can generate working apps from natural language prompts. This is genuinely revolutionary for idea validation.

What you get: A functional prototype that demonstrates your core concept. Good for user testing, investor demos, and figuring out what users actually want.

What you don't get: Production architecture, security, error handling, scalability, or a codebase that a professional developer can maintain and extend.

The catch: We're seeing more and more founders who built with AI tools, showed the prototype to investors, got excited — and then discovered the "app" can't actually handle real users. The gap between "working demo" and "production app" is bigger than it looks. We wrote about this problem in detail.

Use this tier for: Concept validation. Not for launching to real users with real data.

$5K-$20K: No-Code and Low-Code

Platforms like Bubble, Webflow, Adalo, and Glide let you build functional apps without writing code. A skilled no-code developer can build surprisingly capable products.

What you get: A working app with user accounts, databases, basic workflows, and integrations. Often enough to get your first 100-500 users.

What you don't get: Custom UI/UX, complex business logic, native mobile performance, or the ability to scale beyond the platform's limits. You're also locked into the platform vendor.

The catch: No-code works great until it doesn't. Once you hit the platform's limitations — and you will — you're looking at a full rebuild on a custom stack. The question is whether you'll hit that wall at 500 users or 50,000.

Use this tier for: Simple B2B SaaS tools, internal apps, or products where the business model is more important than the user experience.

$15K-$50K: Offshore Development

Hiring offshore developers (typically from Eastern Europe, South Asia, or Latin America) at $25-$75/hour gives you more code for less money.

What you get: Custom-built application code, usually delivered to your specifications.

What you don't get (usually): Product strategy, UX design, architecture guidance, or a team that pushes back when your spec doesn't make sense. You need to know exactly what you want built — the team will build what you ask for, even if what you're asking for is wrong.

The catch: Communication overhead, timezone differences, and varying code quality. The best offshore teams are excellent. The average ones produce code that looks finished but has hidden problems that surface later. Without a technical lead reviewing the work, you won't know which one you got.

Use this tier for: Founders who have a technical co-founder or fractional CTO overseeing the project, and clear specifications.

$30K-$75K: US-Based Product Studio

This is where you get a full team — product strategy, UX design, development, and deployment — working as a unit to build your MVP.

What you get: A production-ready app with proper architecture, security, testing, and CI/CD. Plus the strategic guidance to make sure you're building the right thing. The studio challenges your assumptions, tightens your scope, and ships something that can actually grow.

What you don't get: Unlimited features. A good studio will fight to keep your MVP small — not because they don't want to build more, but because scope creep is the #1 killer of MVP budgets.

The catch: It costs more upfront. But the total cost of ownership is usually lower because you're not rebuilding the app 6 months later.

Use this tier for: Non-technical founders building something they plan to raise money on, scale, and turn into a real business.

$75K-$150K+: Enterprise/Complex Builds

Some MVPs genuinely need this budget level — usually because of regulatory requirements, complex integrations, or technical complexity.

When this is justified:

• Health tech (HIPAA compliance, EHR integrations)
• Fintech (PCI compliance, banking APIs, regulatory reporting)
• Marketplace apps (two-sided with payments, messaging, reviews)
• AI-heavy products with custom ML models

When it's not justified: A single-sided B2B SaaS tool should not cost $100K for an MVP. If an agency quotes you six figures for a straightforward app, get a second opinion.

What Actually Drives MVP Cost?

The features list is obvious. Here's what founders often miss:

• Number of user roles. An app with one user type is dramatically simpler than one with admins, managers, and end users — each with different permissions and views.
• Integrations. Every third-party API (payments, maps, analytics, AI, email) adds 1-3 weeks of development. They're never as simple as the docs suggest.
• Real-time features. Chat, live updates, collaborative editing — anything that requires WebSocket connections or push notifications adds significant complexity.
• Custom design vs. templates. A unique, branded UI costs more than using a component library. Both can be good choices depending on your market.
• Compliance. HIPAA, SOC 2, PCI, GDPR — each adds weeks of implementation and documentation.
• Platform count. Web only is cheapest. iOS + Android with a cross-platform framework (like Flutter) is moderate. Separate native iOS + Android + web is the most expensive.

Where Founders Waste Money

After building 100+ MVPs, here are the most common budget killers:

• Building features nobody uses. Launch with fewer features and add based on real user feedback. That admin dashboard with 15 reports? Your first users won't look at it.
• Custom everything. Use existing solutions for authentication, payments, email, and analytics. Don't build what you can buy.
• Designing for scale before you have users. You don't need microservices, Kubernetes, or a distributed database for your first 10,000 users. A monolith on a single server is fine. Optimize for speed to market, not theoretical scale.
• Changing scope mid-build. Every "quick" feature addition during development costs 2-3x what it would cost if planned upfront. Lock your scope. Launch. Then iterate.
• Skipping UX design. Building without design is like cooking without a recipe. You'll spend more on rework than you would have on doing it right.

How We Think About MVP Budgets

At Eight Bit Studios, most of our MVP engagements land in the $30K-$75K range. We use Flutter and Ruby on Rails because they let us ship fast without cutting corners on code quality.

Our process starts with product strategy — not code. We figure out what your MVP actually needs to prove, cut everything else, and build the smallest thing that validates your hypothesis. Then we ship it, measure it, and iterate based on real data.

If your budget is under $30K, we'll be honest about that too. Sometimes the right answer is "use no-code for now and come back when you've validated the market." We'd rather give you good advice than take money for a project that's underfunded.

Ready to scope your MVP? Tell us about your project and we'll give you an honest estimate.